Supporting the Pledge
copyright © 2003
by Robert L. Blau
The irate parent dragged me out of class just
before the daily flag ceremony.
"I don't want my child saying the Pledge of
Allegiance with those words
in it," she complained.
What we teachers have to put up with! Ever
since the recent court ruling, there have been more incidents like
this. It seems a bit whiny to me.
"What's wrong with the words?" I asked.
"They imply a government endorsement of a certain
world view," she said.
"I don't see it that way," I replied. "The words are
a very general statement that the great majority of people accept,
regardless of their specific beliefs."
"And what about the minority that thinks
differently?" she countered. "Isn't this country supposed to defend the
rights of the minority?"
"The Pledge is an American tradition," I pointed
out. "Removing those words runs counter to that tradition."
"Only about 50 years
of tradition," she claimed. "The words to the Pledge change every 30 to
50 years."
"But the current version is the only one in recent
living memory," I explained reasonably. "Besides, it gets children
thinking early about the nature of the universe."
"Your idea
about the nature of the universe," she carped.
"Look," I cajoled, "what do we have to gain by
taking those words out? What's so bad about including them?"
"Then what's so bad about excluding them?" she snapped.
"You know," I continued reasonably, "our ancestors
came to this country to exercise freedom of thought. That's what
this is about."
"You bet
it is!" she snarled.
"But wait," I said. "They're reciting the Pledge
now. Let's listen ..."
"... one nation, in a Darwinian
world, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
The Christians are the whiniest.